Future Science Group
Browse
- No file added yet -

UK Cost-Effectiveness of Pegcetacoplan Compared with Ravulizumab for Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria - Supplementary materials.docx

Download (30.83 kB)
dataset
posted on 2022-07-07, 08:35 authored by Zalmai Hakimi, Koo Wilson, Eoin McAughey, Michal Pochopien, Piotr Wojciechowski, Mondher Toumi, Chris KnightChris Knight, Sujata P. Sarda, Nikita Patel, Catherine Wiseman, Nuno Pinto de Castro, Jameel Nazir, Richard J Kelly

  

Supplementary Table 1. Estimated utilities based on the Longworth and McKenzie algorithms 

  

Supplementary Table 2. Key scenario analyses

  

Supplementary Table 3. Probability of developing adverse events per cycle 

  

Supplementary Table 4. Iron overload disutility

  

Supplementary Table 5. Number of physician visits/tests per cycle1 and unit healthcare costs

  

Supplementary Table 6. Ravulizumab iron chelation costs

  

Supplementary Table 7. Intravascular haemolysis breakthrough cost for patients who discontinue pegcetacoplan due to intravascular haemolysis breakthrough

  

Supplementary Table 8. Unit costs of managing adverse events

  

Supplementary Table 9. OWSA results for the 10 parameters that contribute the largest difference to the NMB for pegcetacoplan versus ravulizumab 


Funding

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, (Grant / Award Number)

History

Usage metrics

    Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC